This article compares the theoretical performance of the Canon 16-35 f/4L IS USM with the 16-35 f/2.8L II by looking at the MTF graphs for the two lenses.
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
- alexnail on Backpacking & Photography Pt.2 – Camera Equipment
- Dan Kolar on Backpacking & Photography Pt.2 – Camera Equipment
- Lukas Petereit on Drakensberg Nov. ’18 pt.1
- alexnail on Review Canon 16-35 f/4L IS vs 16-35 f/2.8L II for Landscape Photographers
- Maciej Matwiejszyn on Review Canon 16-35 f/4L IS vs 16-35 f/2.8L II for Landscape Photographers
-
Archives
- December 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- January 2017
- February 2016
- January 2016
- July 2015
- May 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- September 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
-
Categories
-
Meta